Everything Totally Explained


Ask & we'll explain, totally!
Gray v. Sanders
Totally Explained


  NEW! All the latest news in the worlds of computer gaming, entertainment, the environment,  
finance, health, politics, science, stocks & shares, technology and much, much, more.  


View this entry using RSS

Everything about Gray V Sanders totally explained

Gray v. Sanders, 372 U.S. 368 (1963), was a Supreme Court of the United States dealing with voting and equal representation.

Background

James Sanders, a voter in Fulton County, Georgia, brought a lawsuit which challenged the legality of the County Unit System. James H. Gray, the chairman of the State Executive Committee of the Democratic Party, was one of the named defendants as the suit focused on the Democratic party primary elections which usually determined the selection of Georgia officeholders.
   Sanders argued that the County Unit System gave unequal voting power to smaller counties. Rural counties which accounted for one-third of Georgia's population also accounted for a majority of County Unit votes. Fulton County had 14.11% of Georgia's population at that time, but only 1.46% (6 unit votes) of the 410 Unit Votes. Echols County, Georgia, the smallest county in Georgia at the time, had 938 people or .05% of the state's population and .48% (1 unit vote) of the unit system. The system managed to give votes to Fulton county at a proportion of one-tenth the county population while giving Echols county a vote which was 10 times the population of the county.
   The Supreme Court had refused to hear previous challenges to the Unit System, but after the Baker v. Carr decision, the court chose to hear this case.

The Court's decision

By a vote of 8 to 1, the court struck down the County Unit System. Justice William O. Douglas wrote the majority opinion and said "The concept of political equality...can mean only one thing--one person, one vote". The court found that the separation of voters in the same election into different classes was a violation of the 14th Amendment's guarantee of equal protection. Justice John Marshall Harlan II dissented, suggesting that the case be sent back for retrial for an investigation into the constitutional requirements for legislative districts.

Aftermath

Georgia had the option of modifying the county unit system to make it more equal, but instead the state decided to move to using the popular vote in primary elections.

Further Information

Get more info on 'Gray V Sanders'.


External Link Exchanges

Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:

    <a href="http://gray_v__sanders.totallyexplained.com">Gray v. Sanders Totally Explained</a>

Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
   As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned.



Copyright © 2007-8 totallyexplained.com | Licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License | Site Map
This article contains text from the Wikipedia article Gray v. Sanders (History) and is released under the GFDL | RSS Version